> Read the previous post. You don't 'own' anything. You correct factual > mistakes but you have no 'side' in the discussion.
You're right. I don't take "sides" for the sake of taking sides. I try to see the value of as many perspectives as possible, and to understand and be able to reason from them. I said, from the outset, that I'm not ideological in that way. Ideology is rather like mental training wheels. There comes a time when you don't need it. >Corrections just mean > you need to go look it up and fix it. Not change your mind. I'm not sure what this even means. If I make a factual mistake, and look it up and see that I was wrong, I then change my mind regarding that fact. It may, or may not, change my interpretation of related facts, but I do change my mind. I presume any sane person thinks this way? > > How much does Langley pay you by the word to do that? We don't get paid by the word. If we did, I'd have already retired. And I don't work for Langley. Brussels.
