On Sat, 26 Nov 2016 07:05:43 -0800 Razer <ray...@riseup.net> wrote: > > > On 11/25/2016 10:45 PM, John Newman wrote: > > Drugs prohibition is fucking heinous. > > I don't think it matters what the substance is. Locking an addict > > up does not cure them =) > > > > It's all a bad fucking joke - a "war" to perpetuate a vested > > interest in keeping prison populations high (and profitable), to > > systematically fuck a certain cross section of society (blacks, the > > poor), and to keep people on all sides of the issue scared. > > > > > > > > John > > > The option taken... If you EVER get out on the streets where the drugs > are sold and used, is to decriminalize, not medical-ize, and THEN > give them gubmint checks in the hopes the drug user kills themself > off in some motel room saving taxpayers money. > > That IS the libertarian solution to the problem.
Hard to tell if that's meant as (self) parody or what. Of course "to decriminalize, not medical-ize" IS the libertarian solution. The part about government checks is typical nonsense though. > Another reason why > refer to Libertarians are self-centric fascist scum in every convo I > have about them Although most self-described libertarians tend to suck - because they actually don't get libertarian principles - commies are hardly in any position to criticize them, communism being the ultimate totalitarian ideology. Not to mention, fascists and commies, left and right, are close cousins. > > Rr > > > > > On Nov 26, 2016, at 12:40 AM, Razer <ray...@riseup.net > > <mailto:ray...@riseup.net>> wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> On 11/25/2016 09:31 PM, juan wrote that variation in dosage of > >> natural substance: > >> > >>> makes dosage unreliable. >