On 12/13/2016 02:34 AM, grarpamp wrote: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 1:24 PM, #$%& <#$%&#$%&@gmail.com> wrote: >> nuke is worse than oil and has the same 'geopolitical >> dependencies'. > I know it has sourcing and mining issues but we know > safe open crowd reviewed plant designs and open > inspections are possible for those bold enough to > set aside secret corp profit bullshit, and obviously there > are zero emissions, except for waste. And maybe > similar source reserve timescales as hydrocarbon fuels.
The issues I have with nuclear energy, are that when things go wrong... they go *really* wrong. Sure, they may not fail as often as they used to, but that doesn't mean shit isn't going to *really* go sideways when it does. Seriously, the Fukushima disaster makes the Exxon Valdez and Deepwater Horizon incidents look like a few guys pissed in the ocean. Nom nom nom radioactive fish... -- Shawn K. Quinn <skqu...@rushpost.com> http://www.rantroulette.com http://www.skqrecordquest.com