The Grugq was an 0day reseller who transitioned to Infosec/Opsec bobblehead. Still maintaining close ties to the hand that feeds.
On December 28, 2016 4:25:47 AM CST, The Cuckq <the.cu...@sigaint.org> wrote: >> the.grugq at gmail.com: >> panacea > >No shit. Prevention is the point of Tor, not damage mitigation, i.e., >"healing" > >> privacy activist cult > >TIL: privacy = cult > >> I got triggered > >What a fagq > >> strong security posture > >It is only posturing, isn't it > >> security (and/or privacy) > >Without security there is no privacy; isn't this guy a philosopher >king; wtf > >> VPN provides the same protections > >Bullshit, VPNs are guaranteed to fail > >Tor is at least a gamble, until trust-aware path selection enables a >better experience > >> Tor has only one use case to evade the authorities > >This fuckq with the pro-LEA false narratives > >> VPNs are (typically) not actively malicious > >Neither are "whites" > >> and you have no good reason to use it >> except as an evasion tool against state authorities > >Again with the false narratives > >> Tor Browser Bundle is the worst browser possible > >I guess he never used IE/Edge or Chrome > >What a newb > >> Anonymity is essentially a property of a system that ensures any user >> is equally likely to be the source of an event > >This guy is fucking retarded > >Not knowing who dun it doesn't mean it could be anybody > >> Diversity is obviously less good for anonymity > >Seeing a user as a regular Chrome, FF, or Safari user does more for >anonymity than Tor homogeneity > >> Global Passive Adversary > >It is clear that they are actively attacking people, why use inaccurate >labels -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.