On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 09:30:14PM -0300, Juan wrote: > On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 16:22:36 -0800 > Razer <g...@riseup.net> wrote: > > > On 01/08/2017 03:35 PM, juan wrote: > > > > > > If some sort of magical mud magically liquified under a > > > building, then the building would magically sink in a > > > pool of mud. Especially when there are 'a couple' of videos > > > showing a building that indeed seems to be 'sinking'. > > > > > > > > > > Ok class. Here we have a tuning fork (A440) and a glass of water. > > I know what resonance is, you motherfucking scumbag. > > Now prove that > > "the shock wave from the WTC tower hits liquefied the > mud, and undermined the (shoddily constructed) building 7." > > > Since that is what 'really' happened, it must be documented > everywhere. Even in places like wikimierda. So go ahead, post > the link : > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WTC7_SUNK_IN_BROWN_SHIT_POOL_RAYZERZZ_SAYZ_ZO > > Or are you claiming that you are a truther whose TRUE THEORY is > BEING SUPPRESSED by a BURGEOIS CONSPIRACY?
Oh oh oh! I know, I know - pick me! Pick me! That razonance didn't liquify the mud, IT LIQUIFIED THE ROCK LAYER under the towers, which sunk through the rock and the rock de-liquified, leaving no trace (conspiracy theories and documentaries of 3 days of rapid cleanup of ground zero to the contrary) of the SUNK TOWERS! Here's the photographic proof of the post-liquified rock layers at ground zero: https://www.metabunk.org/claim-picture-shows-rock-formation-under-wtc-caused-by-nuclear-device.t4595/ (Come on! At least this variant of borderline-Razer-therapy includes photographic PROOF of the post-liquiefied rock layer...) Well color me pre-glacial sandstone.
