-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 03/07/2017 06:27 PM, John Newman wrote: >>> Not sure about those two. Another explanation could be this : >>> >>> there wasn't any malware served, and the users of the site >>> were identified using plain old traffic analysis. That's >>> certainly something that both the government AND the tor mafia >>> would like to sweep under the rug. >>> >>> > >> I think that might be very likely. How many times has the tor >> project publicly acknowledged attacks involving ephemeral setup >> of large number of tor nodes for purpose of attack? > >> Would NSA even need to own any nodes considering how many >> different places they have taps into the internet? I don't think >> so. Sounds reasonable if NSA was involved: But this show was billed as an FBI production, and I don't think the NSA ventures into law enforcement territory. The narrative presented by the FBI, including the use of an exploit against Firefox + Microsoft sounded plausible to me at the time. :o) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJYv5iJAAoJEECU6c5Xzmuq1lcIALirvX7yZ10VI8sbQNyjrPLI hcXa4kiQF4yvzGZMLYaXGCVHU8VJ2J0qE0YBr/vG5K0Z1LjiwMuPxNUgg3worx9n NXRMWO5LaF/4F5b6nQPuqlt/fpizKMpr3WTuhLTz2FkR+rMonlCVFm3QdsQ9dvwJ haZ/UwetKzJNxJfFDQNCKobtknZyfs05hUvcdWMLefiZeOXD9duNmk8PUNBwJy4I +Y+467G9BKDrs5AUQVe4rKBWoG4xI8ewB7Ks1oHjWueAhZ9vGyaTWx7dvRl/iOqK RU7UplXG8H72BwFQDABbxPRpgli+zc4NKAH1WlOk00rKXWzfDKZ4gSCuJ7uC/Do= =B6WC -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
