On 04/12/2017 11:11 PM, grarpamp wrote: >> I foresee a not-for-profit venture that seeks out any and all devices >> that aren't protected and seeks to permanently disable them. > Pointless when you can write the maker and get them to > pay you in anon VC's to brick the gear of their competitor. > While you arrange the same deal with said competitor. > Profit x 2.
Some makers don't respond. Notably and recently the people who made the dildo with the camera that 'went live'. People make these things, grab what bucks they can from them, and vanish. Rr
