On 05/31/2017 07:39 AM, John Newman wrote: > > >> On May 30, 2017, at 4:36 PM, juan <juan....@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Mon, 29 May 2017 18:41:30 -0400 >> grarpamp <grarp...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=021PuzHG_YA >>> https://www.youtube.com/results?q=risk+poitras&sp=CAI%= >>> infohash: 4D0FA67D82682390D7920E1930B02CB45B3CAB96 >> >> >> "...Poitras made significant changes in the film over >> the past year (since a screening at the 2016 Cannes >> film festival). According to various accounts, it was >> “a much more straightforward, positive portrayal of >> WikiLeaks and Assange,” an “activist documentary” that >> made “an overwhelming case for Assange as a political >> prisoner.” >> >> But this was prior to the exposure of the Democratic >> Party’s corrupt inner workings by WikiLeaks and claims >> that the Russians were involved, supposedly to aid >> Donald Trump. As Slate notes, “Subsequently, Poitras >> spent months revising her film for release this Friday.” >> >> These facts alone should alert the reader to much of >> what he or she needs to know. Poitras has accommodated >> herself in part to the hysteria, driven by the >> Democratic Party hierarchy, over alleged Russian >> interference in the US elections. >> >> That would be bad enough, but in addition and >> connected to that, the filmmaker has >> essentially bowed to the pressure of the >> incessant and reactionary claims that Assange >> is a “sexual predator.” " >> >> et cetera > > It would obviously be fascinating to get a copy of the Cannes cut. > I wonder if it will see the light of day (my guess is not, but who knows) >
Not that i really care on a deep level about Russia-Trump machinations. In the end it is just another powerful leader playing power games. I would love to see what Assange has on Trump. I expect he will release it when it is most damaging. That seems to be what he does. --- M
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
