> On Jun 30, 2017, at 6:57 AM, James A. Donald <jam...@echeque.com> wrote: > >> On 13/06/2017 8:54 PM, \0xDynamite wrote: >> The law ends at the courts, not the police. Let the >> police use it and then argue for it's unconstitionality. > > The courts are corrupt. We need Duterte's solution to judicial corruption > and lawlessness. > > The courts are no substitute for a disciplined police force - it is easier > for judges to get away with wicked, abusive, and corrupt behavior than it is > for police. As for example patent law and the silicone lawsuits. > > The various protections for criminals are part of an endless effort to get > black conviction and imprisonment rates down to white levels, thus in > practice these protections apply to black criminals, not to law abiding > cishet whites. Consider, for example the conviction of Martha Stewart, > supposedly for insider trading - but what she was actually convicted of was > obstruction of justice, which she obstructed by not confessing to things that > they they could not prove her guilty of. > > She sold a bunch of shares just before bad news hit, which is illegal if you > know the bad news because of your insider position, and have neglected to > make it public before you sell the adversely affected shares. > > But they could not prove that she knew the bad news before she sold the > shares, so she was in fact convicted for obstructing injustice, convicted her > for not confessing to a crime that they plausibly suspected, but were never > able to prove. > > Compare the Martha Stewart case to a recent supreme court case, where some > blacks in a car doing a drug deal drove in a reckless and dangerous manner, > because they were distracted by the drug deal. The supremes ruled that > though police could ordinarily arrest them for dangerous driving, and, > surprise surprise, find the drugs, it was improper to do that in this case > because the dangerous driving arrest might be motivated by the fact that they > saw them dealing drugs, and seeing them dealing drugs has been deemed > insufficient grounds for search. > > Had police not noticed the drug deal going down, then they could have > arrested them for dangerous driving and found the drugs. But because police > saw the drug deal going down, the drugs that they found were ruled > inadmissable. > > If you are doing a characteristically black crime, police are not allowed to > see what is right in front of them. If you are suspected of doing a > characteristically white middle class crime, you are subject to the most > lawless and arbitrary inquisition. > > Duterte for president in 2024!
You are so full of shit, your eyeballs are as black as the african skin you consider sub-human. I'd scream "fake news!" for a laugh, but it's been successfully coopted by your bunch to the point of being totally meaningless.
