On Thu, 14 Sep 2017 01:41:34 -0400
grarpamp <grarp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> If this solution uses today's computers to drive the beam, since
> those computers cannot be trusted, and you can't see the beam
> or resultant features....
ok...
>
> I suggest that building an OpenFab capable of producing a
> much higher than zero, higher than even implied guesstimates,
> level of explicit trust
except the tools used in the fab can't be trusted either? Why
would you trust equipment built by the government or by the
handful of 'private' fascist firms who work as government
proxies?
> is now within both reach and need of those
> interested in its value. Certainly the problem space is better
> understood such that a framework can begin to be designed.
>
> As before, you have to rebuild it all from scratch, under a
> new paradigm, before you'll ever be able to trust anything.
pretty much true...
