Lots of white people, myself among them, flipped houses.
On 1/7/2018 8:33 AM, juan wrote:
thanks for personally admitting that you are a thieving scammer.
Buying something and selling it is not theft, nor is it a scam if the
thing is as it is represented to be.
The thieving scammers were those who purchased houses with no intention
or ability to repay the mortgage - people who purchased houses with no
assets. And you cannot purchase a house with no assets, unless you are
a beneficiary of affirmative action.
Thus precisely zero white males or married white women were thieving
scammers in housing boom.
The financial crisis was the result of dud mortgages.
The dud mortgages, all of them, were affirmative action mortgages. What
drove the housing boom is that *if* *you* *were* *a* *beneficiary* *of*
*affirmative* *action* *then* you could buy an expensive house despite
being stone broke.
The housing boom was the result of affirmative action mortgages.
White males were involved in this process only as flipping houses with
the intent of unloading the houses on affirmative action purchasers.
A white male would buy a house with the intention and capability of
paying the mortgage if things went bad, but with the expectation that he
could unload on an affirmative action borrower before things went bad.
And for the most part, that is exactly what we did.
And the reason we chose to do this is that we know that white males are
forced to honor contracts, while affirmative action beneficiaries can
walk away with no problems.
So we, unlike the end purchasers, told the truth and honored all agreements.
The housing boom was the result of affirmative action loans. The
financial crisis was the result dud mortgages. The dud mortgages, all
of them, were affirmative action loans.
