Freenet seems to work when you predominantly or solely use private/dark peers.
On Thu, Aug 2, 2018, 4:28 PM Mirimir <miri...@riseup.net> wrote: > On 08/02/2018 04:14 PM, Steven Schear wrote: > > "Augur’s creators claim they don’t have control over what its users > choose > > to do with the protocol—or the ability to shut it down. This creates a > > problem that is “endemic” to blockchain technology, says Wright, who > > recently co-wrote a book on the subject: “If you do not have a very > > concrete intermediary—i.e., a company or group of people that are running > > the marketplace—how do you apply laws and prevent that activity from > > occurring?” > > > > This is, as they say in marketing, not a problem but a feature. > > Yep. I mean, that's the fucking point! > > But I gotta say, they need to work on the anonymity aspect. The argument > that participation anonymity doesn't matter, as long as adversaries > can't attribute stuff, is weak. Look at Freenet, for example. > > > On Thu, Aug 2, 2018, 3:55 PM jim bell <jdb10...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > >> > >> > https://www.technologyreview.com/s/611757/this-new-ethereum-based-assassination-market-platform-could-cause-napster-size-legal/ > > <SNIP> > >
