On 1/6/19 3:56 PM, grarpamp wrote: > https://www.engadget.com/2019/01/05/apple-ces-2019-privacy-advertising/ > https://www.engadget.com/2016/02/18/fbi-apple-iphone-explainer/ > https://www.android.com/security-center/ > https://source.android.com/security > https://apple.com/privacy > > "What happens on your iPhone, stays on your iPhone."
> That privacy priority came > into clear focus three years ago when Apple refused to assist the FBI > in unlocking an iPhone that belonged to a suspected terrorist in San > Bernardino, CA. I would describe that episode as a publicity stunt cooked up by the FBI and DoD contractor Apple. If I recall correctly, Apple claimed it "could not" unlock the device in question; but after public attention started to die down, a 3rd party forensics shop did unlock it. Meanwhile, back in the network security world, Declan Mccullagh reported: https://www.cnet.com/news/apple-deluged-by-police-demands-to-decrypt-iphones/ "ATF says no law enforcement agency could unlock a defendant's iPhone, but Apple can 'bypass the security software' if it chooses. Apple has created a police waiting list because of high demand." :o)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
