https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/10/donald-trump-2016-rigged-nixon-kennedy-1960-214395
 "FBI agents who had placed wire taps on key Daley lieutenants (for entirely 
unrelated purposes) also had reason to believe that Illinois was rigged."

The FBI had:
1. Evidence that the election was stolen.
2. Decided to do nothing about it.

Why? How much crime does the FBI observe, and do nothing about, and thus in a 
sense, authorize and permit to occur? If you do not remove people who abuse 
their positions to engage in criminal acts, in effect you end up with a 
Praetorian Guard.

Is this necessarily a new phenomena?

https://abcnews.go.com/US/south-carolina-police-chief-officers-charged-taking-bribes/story?id=62054026
https://www.chicagotribune.com/suburbs/lake-county-news-sun/news/ct-lns-north-chicago-police-chief-trial-st-1030-story.html

https://www.nytimes.com/1970/04/25/archives/graft-paid-to-police-here-said-to-run-into-millions-survey-links.html
https://www.nytimes.com/1972/03/04/archives/10-of-the-70-newburgh-police-indicted.html

I wonder what unrelated purposes those Daley wiretaps were for.

Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.

Reply via email to