On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 04:58:23AM -0300, Punk-Stasi 2.0 wrote:
> On Sat, 30 May 2020 21:35:38 -0400
>
> grarpamp-corona-fucktard <grarp...@gmail.com> wrote: bullshit
>
>
> here's some meaningful numbers
>
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_pandemic_in_Germany#By_age_and_gender
>
> age
>
> 100+ 5 45 50
> 90-99 522 974 1,496
> 80-89 1,945 1,743 3,688
> 70-79 1,243 601 1,844
>
> total cases 8200
>
>
> 60% of the cases (people over 80) are natural deaths. Actually a fair
> amount of people over 70 can be included, so percentage of natural deaths is
> around 80%.
>
> percentage of people under 50 years, 1% - 80 people. No doubt that's
> the result of a chinese 'bioweapon'...
"It's All Bullsh*t" – 3 Leaks That Sink The COVID Narrative
Kit Knightly via Off-Guardian.org,
https://off-guardian.org/2020/05/31/its-all-bullsht-3-leaks-that-sink-the-covid-narrative/
https://www.zerohedge.com/health/its-all-bullsht-3-leaks-sink-covid-narrative
In recent days a series of leaks across the globe have further shown the
“official line” on coronavirus does not hold water...
The science of the coronavirus is not disputed. It is well documented and
openly admitted:
https://off-guardian.org/2020/05/15/watch-uk-chief-medic-confirms-again-covid19-harmless-to-vast-majority/
- Most people won’t get the virus.
- Most of the people who get it won’t display symptoms.
- Most of the people who display symptoms will only be mildly sick.
- Most of the people with severe symptoms will never be critically
ill.
- And most of the people who get critically ill will survive.
This is borne out by the numerous serological studies which show, again
and again, that the infection fatality ratio is on par with flu.
https://swprs.org/studies-on-covid-19-lethality/
There is no science – and increasingly little rational discussion – to
justify the lockdown measures and overall sense of global panic.
Nevertheless, it’s always good to get official acknowledgement of the
truth, even if it has to be leaked.
Here are three leaks showing that those in power know that the
coronavirus poses no threat, and in no way justifies the lockdown that is going
to destroy the livelihoods of so many.
1. “IT’S ALL BULLSHIT!”
On May 26th Dr Alexander Myasnikov, Russia’s head of coronavirus
information, gave an interview to former-Presidential candidate Ksenia Sobchak
in which he apparently let slip his true feelings.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6CpI22QJ07Q&feature=youtu.be&t=3360
https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2020/05/27/its-all-bullsht-russias-coronavirus-information-chief-says-of-virus-fears-a70398
Believing the interview over, and the camera turned off, Myasnikov said:
It’s all bullshit […] It’s all exaggerated. It’s an acute respiratory
disease with minimal mortality […] Why has the whole world been destroyed? That
I don’t know,”
2. “COVID-19 CANNOT BE DESCRIBED AS A GENERALLY DANGEROUS DISEASE”
According to an e-mail leaked to Danish newspaper Politiken, the Danish
Health Authority disagree with their government’s approach to the coronavirus.
They cover it in two articles here and here (For those who don’t speak Danish,
thelocal.dk have covered the story too).
https://politiken.dk/indland/art7805054/Mail-v%C3%A6kker-opsigt-og-bestyrtelse-p%C3%A5-Christiansborg
https://politiken.dk/forbrugogliv/sundhedogmotion/art7803218/Mette-Frederiksen-var-uenig-med-S%C3%B8ren-Brostr%C3%B8m-og-tog-magten-fra-ham
https://www.thelocal.dk/20200529/leaked-emails-show-how-denmarks-pm-steam-rollered-her-own-health-agency/amp
There’s a lot of interesting information there, not least of which is the
clear implication that politicians appear to be pressing the scientific
advisors to overstate the danger (they did the same thing in the UK), along
with the decision of some civil servants to withhold data from the public until
after the lockdown had been extended.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-04-28/top-aide-to-u-k-s-johnson-pushed-scientists-to-back-lockdown
But by far the most important quote is from a March 15th e-mail [our
emphasis]:
The Danish Health Authority continues to consider that covid-19 cannot
be described as a generally dangerous disease, as it does not have either a
usually serious course or a high mortality rate,”
On March 12th the Danish parliament passed an emergency law which – among
many other things – decreased the power of the Danish Health Authority,
demoting it from a “regulatory authority” to just an “advisory” one.
3. “A GLOBAL FALSE ALARM”
Earlier this month, on May 9th, a report was leaked to the German
alternate media magazine Tichys Einblick titled “Analysis of the Crisis
Management”.
https://www.tichyseinblick.de/daili-es-sentials/exklusiv-auf-te-ein-vorwurf-koennte-lauten-der-staat-hat-sich-in-der-coronakrise-als-einer-der-groessten-fake-news-produzenten-erwiesen/
The report was commissioned by the German department of the interior, but
then its findings were ignored, prompting one of the authors to release it
through non-official channels.
The fall out of that, including attacks on the authors and minimising of
the report’s findings, is all very fascinating and we highly recommend this
detailed report on Strategic Culture (or read the full report here in German).
https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2020/05/29/german-official-leaks-report-denouncing-corona-as-global-false-alarm/
https://off-guardian.org/wp-content/medialibrary/Dokument93.pdf?x10376
We’re going to focus on just the reports conclusions, including [our
emphasis]:
- The dangerousness of Covid-19 was overestimated: probably at no
point did the danger posed by the new virus go beyond the normal level.
- The danger is obviously no greater than that of many other viruses.
There is no evidence that this was more than a false alarm.
- During the Corona crisis the State has proved itself as one of the
biggest producers of Fake News.
After being attacked in the press, and suspended from his job, the leaker
and other authors of the report released a joint statement, calling on the
government to respond to their findings.
https://deutsch.rt.com/inland/102396-umstrittene-bmi-analyse-wissenschaftler-kritisieren/
* * *
If the current crisis was being approached rationally by all parties,
these leaks would seal the debate. Evidence is piling up that the people in
charge knew, from the very beginning, that the virus was not dangerous. The
question remaining is: Why are these leaks happening now?
