But when Trump was elected, the man who designed the software and the
following excerpt was working for a military contractor to do so,
rather than a political party.  I'm having trouble continuing to read
his book ;p

> Insurgencies, by nature, are asymmetric, in that a few people can cause large 
> effects. So catalyzing an insurgency within the belligerent’s organization 
> requires first concentrating resources on a few key target groups. This is 
> optimized by good profiling and identifying the types of people who are both 
> susceptible to new ways of thinking and connected enough to inject our 
> counternarrative into their social network.
>
> The most effective form of perspecticide is one that first mutates the 
> concept of self. In this light, the manipulator attempts to “steal” the 
> concept of self from his target, replacing it with his own. This usually 
> starts with attempting to smother the opponent’s narratives and then 
> dominating the informational environment around the target. Often this 
> involves gradually breaking down what are called psychological resilience 
> factors over several months. Programs are designed to create unrealistic 
> perceptions in the targets that result in confusion and damage self-efficacy. 
> Targets are encouraged to begin catastrophizing about minor or imagined 
> events, and counternarratives attempt to remove meaning, creating an 
> impression of confusing or senseless events. Counternarratives also attempt 
> to foster distrust in order to mitigate an existing hierarchy or group when 
> you begin to think that you are being used in some unfair way, or when events 
> seem senseless or purposeless. You become less willing to accept setbacks, 
> take risks, or comply with commands.
>
> But simply degrading morale is often not enough. The ultimate aim is to 
> trigger negative emotions and thought processes associated with impulsive, 
> erratic, or compulsive behavior. This moves a target from mild or passive 
> resistance (e.g., less productivity, taking fewer risks, rumors, etc.) into a 
> realm of more disruptive behaviors (e.g., arguing, insubordination, mutiny, 
> etc.). This approach has been taken in South America, for example, to provoke 
> disunity among members of narcotics operations, increasing the likelihood of 
> information leaks, defections, or internal conflicts that erode a supply 
> chain. The most susceptible targets are typically the ones who exhibit 
> neurotic or narcissistic traits, as they tend to be less psychologically 
> resilient to stressing narratives. This is because neuroticism can make a 
> person more prone to paranoid ideation, as they tend to experience more 
> anxiety and impulsiveness and place more reliance on intuitive rather than 
> deliberative thinking. People high on the narcissism scale are susceptible 
> because they are more prone to

Reply via email to