> > > > i got gemini to agree that if we took every particle in the universe > > > > and precisely made it an antiparticle with precisely negated charge, > > > > position, and momentum, that the progression of the history of the > > > > universe would then precisely flow backward. (of course the > > > > transformation of information to high precision in such a scenario is > > > > so far beyond astronomical as for that to be in the realm of > > > > impossibility even for me to consider) > > > > > > > > then i got into a space of confusion again. i asked it to imagine a > > > > futuristic pod that could provide a precise high entropy environment > > > > for an antimatter agent inside the pod to have a logical experience of > > > > time flowing backwards (a simulation of a reversed system [[and asked > > > > > > so, and now i sound like gemini, such a pod differs from a time > > > machine in that it is more a way to expend incredibly huge amounts of > > > energy in order to orchestrate that antimatter display its properties > > > of acting as if time were reversed. but there's no expectation that > > > this pod would exist prior to its creation for example or after any > > > point in time where the state of its observable environment couldn't > > > be precisely predicted from the past. > > > we could try to expand such a pod to the idea of a time machine but > > > it's quite limited as is and not intended to be one at this time. > > > notably it's not reasonable to produce that environment of states, > > > it's much much harder than unburning a fire by mapping the path of > > > every particle from it. > > > > > > > it how it might process light ... > > > > this is where i am at trying to read its long reply: > > > Is the pod showing the agent images of the external world by controlling > > > photons? If the pod is projecting images for the agent to see, then: > > > Agent's View (τ): The pod's projector (an anti-projector, presumably) > > > emits photons (in the agent's τ forward time). These photons form an > > > image on the agent's "retina." Normal. > > > Our View (t): The pod's "anti-projector" would appear to us to be > > > absorbing photons that are converging on it in a highly specific pattern > > > (the image). This is the "time-reversed emission" we discussed. The pod > > > would need to be an incredibly sophisticated "photon collector" to > > > achieve this if it's showing images of our external world in a way that > > > makes sense for the agent's reversed time. > > > > i'm maybe 1/3rd through the above. i'm excited that it talks about > > photons appearing absorbed vs emitted because earlier in its reply it > > assumed the anticamera processed received photons from the sun which > > doesn't seem to make sense to me. > > This idea of some time travel agent being stuck in a world of > non-anti-matter where everything behaves _so_ backwards that -- -- > anyway, it seems conceptually very similar to being inside karl! where > part of karl tries to do A at the same time as other part tries to do > ~A and it exhausts energy to maintain harsh disparate adjacency > everywhere. crossing border just doesn't work, but there it is, a > world of opposites
whenever you try to peek into or counter the world of opposites this giant opposite force takes everything over !
