> different topic. > > Let’s imagine an imaginary mailing list topiced around cryptography, > with multiple influences changing its content. one of these influences > could be an anti cryptography influence. What kind of cryptography > would an anti cryptography influence support, in such a scenario? > > What if we were to xor every bit of a message with 0s. This may sound > new to some, but there is a hook — our xor0 operation exists in a > fallible physical world, where, due to electromagnetic noise, > component degradation, corruption, os and microcode bugs, etc etc etc > certainly malicious actors, cosmic rays, and the karma and intents of > the user (!;s) along with cpu overclocking and electron hole density > fluctuations … — sometimes this xor0 operation returns an incorrect > result. > > It’s not bad ! I wrote about it for a paragr—!
One could go on, on that topic. Here’s another —- uhhh or Hmm
