> > > > the cmos is said to operate at 8 fps … this would make my argument > > > > with the ai wrong unless (e.g. amortized with many parallel things or > > > > something maybe), because normally one matrix op relies on output of > > > > last. Maybe that is what it was trying to get at. In the microscopy > > > > papers they imply cmos is faster than this — but in the fpm papers I > > > > was excited about recently they usually do low resolution. > > > > > > > > It sounds like it may be possible but if so I haven’t sorted out how > > > > quite yet, to do fast tokens. Maybe by engaging the internals of the > > > > cmos somehow? > > > > > > > > I sure didn’t connect that! I was expecting faster cmos > > > > > > yeah the Sony IMX500 used in the raspberry pi camera can do 12MP/60fps > > > or 1080p at 240fps [1] > > > 1: https://developer.sony.com/imx500/imx500-key-specifications > > > > Oh bit the numbers from perplexity were for a 3,000mp chip 0.o sounds > > expensive
It was 410 mp/ 8 fps. 3,000mp/s . The page perplexity cited says it also does 100MP @ 24 fps and implying 4x underlying pixel depth from binning. (Note though that 24 < 8 x 4, although it may get 32 fps with binning disabled, I dunno. Either way 75% is not much if one is trying to get to milliseconds or microseconds or whichever it was > > Oh! But these chips generally offer higher frame rates at lower > resolutions, so they _already_ can exchange between space and time. It > should be fine to reorder matrices to be more serial.
