At 05:21 PM 8/11/00 -0400, A. Melon wrote:
>
>No. JY, if anything, should be given less of a break. He is a so-called
>champion of full disclosure. Refusing to reveal information because it
>affects *his* family, when he has shown such blatant disregard for others'
>families in the past, is atrocious.
Yes, *if* his inlaw was really relevent to cryptome-type collections, other
than him being related to JY. If *your* fascination with his inlaw is
simply because of his relation to JY, then I think its *you* treating JY
differently. (Probably because you are offended by some of his actions.)
