On Sun, 22 Jul 2001, Declan McCullagh wrote:

> > That has yet to be proven. Simply tumping a vehicle over is not in and of
> > itself 'intent to do physical harm'. You assume, without evidence, that
> > the protestors even knew the van was occupied. Further, you assume that
> > the protestor shot was actually involved. Further, you assume that the
> > store the police stated is accurate.
> 
> A close look at the Reuters photo sequence shows that these "assumptions"
> are in truth conclusions.

Actually no, they don't. All they show is a group of people turning a van
over. As to addressing their 'intent', especially with respect to 'harming
the cops' they say nothing. Photo's don't capture the mind.


 --
    ____________________________________________________________________

                Nature and Nature's laws lay hid in night:
                God said, "Let Tesla be", and all was light.

                                          B.A. Behrend

       The Armadillo Group       ,::////;::-.          James Choate
       Austin, Tx               /:'///// ``::>/|/      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
       www.ssz.com            .',  ||||    `/( e\      512-451-7087
                           -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'-
    --------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to