>From Black Unicorn: >To me the important distinction is to recognize what we want the ideal to be, >but avoid running afoul of the law in the process. --------------------------------------------- If one does recognize what the ideal is to be, and it happens to be contrary to existing law, how can running afoul of it be prevented? Are you speaking stealth, evasion, secrecy, etc., in the use of technological means, or in addition to them? .. Blanc
- RE: Laws of mathematics, not of men Sandy Sandfort
- RE: Laws of mathematics, not of... John Young
- RE: Laws of mathematics, not of... jamesd
- Re: Laws of mathematics, not of... Declan McCullagh
- Re: Laws of mathematics, not of men Dr. Evil
- Re: Laws of mathematics, not of... Alan Olsen
- RE: Laws of mathematics, not of men Alan Olsen
- Re: Laws of mathematics, not of men Declan McCullagh
- Re: Forced disclosures, document seizures, Right and... Jim Choate
- RE: Forced disclosures, document seizures, Right and Wron... Trei, Peter
- Re: Forced disclosures, document seizures, Right and Wron... Blanc
- Re: Forced disclosures, document seizures, Right and Wron... Nomen Nescio
- Re: Forced disclosures, document seizures, Right and Wron... Blanc