On 2 --
On 2 Aug 2001, at 19:01, Aimee Farr wrote:
[...]
(under ' 1503, documents destroyed do not have to
> be under subpoena; it is sufficient if the defendant is aware that the grand
> jury will likely seek the documents in its investigation);
\All these citations obviously refer to situations where the case is
already under way, and are thus irrelevant to the claims made by
Black Unicorn.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
kd0oj5fW/o0EwOuuRzu0rlgeZRTBEVnHnrOlq6Ym
4GYnFP1LaTnH+jnHwsBZ1Ad41opi6PXN0S+xhyaK8