--
On 16 Aug 2001, at 13:17, Morlock Elloi wrote:
> Sorry to bother the audience with purely crypto issues, I just
wonder if anyone
> else evaluated this Ferguson's paper on apparent simplicity and
therefore
> insecurity of Rijndael:
>
> http://www.xs4all.nl/~vorpal/pubs/rdalgeq.html
"and therefore insecurity"
Does not follow.
I would argue that rather the simpler, the stronger. A simple
structure, if it can be broken, would have simple breaks.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
S1hKxB2ZdiFQfFn/0TRow7KAF/Yu/430mi64oJi/
4ThCd/XGQLmoLjr/QPNOba1CIvb3yflWK2CXzPoZz