On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 09:12:50PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Declan McCullagh wrote: > > <much true stuff snipped> > > > But > > even given the tattered First Amendment, there is still a difference > > between speech and action. > > Complete and utter bullshit. "Measl" sometimes posts worthy stuff, so instead of flaming him, I'll just say that much of First Amendment jurisprudence is based on the distinctions between speech and action. It is not an absolute line, of course, speech ("give me your money or else", falsely shouting fire in a crowded theater, fighting words) can be suppressed, but it is a useful distinction nonetheless. -Declan
- Re: The Privacy/Untraceability Sweet Spot jamesd
- Re: The Privacy/Untraceability Sweet Spot jamesd
- Re: The Privacy/Untraceability Sweet Spot mmotyka
- Re: The Privacy/Untraceability Sweet Spot Declan McCullagh
- Re: The Privacy/Untraceability Sweet Spot measl
- Re: The Privacy/Untraceability Sweet Spot jamesd
- Re: The Privacy/Untraceability Sweet Spot measl
- Re: The Privacy/Untraceability Sweet Spot Declan McCullagh
- Re: The Privacy/Untraceability Sweet Spot measl
- Re: The Privacy/Untraceability Sweet Spot Nomen Nescio
- Re: The Privacy/Untraceability Sweet Spot Paul Pomes
- RE: Re: The Privacy/Untraceability Sweet Spot Fisher Mark
- Re: The Privacy/Untraceability Sweet Spot Fisher Mark
- Re: The Privacy/Untraceability Sweet Spot Declan McCullagh
- Re: The Privacy/Untraceability Sweet Spot jamesd
- Re: The Privacy/Untraceability Sweet Spot Jim Choate
- Re: The Privacy/Untraceability Sweet Spot Nomen Nescio