I thought everyone knew. Fonts aren't copyrightable. Font *names* are. The reverse of the norm. With a story or novel the body of text is copyrightable, the title isn't.
DCF On Tue, 18 Dec 2001, Declan McCullagh wrote: > Why wouldn't an original typeface be covered under U.S. copyright laws? > > -Declan > > At 10:12 AM 12/18/2001 -0800, David Honig wrote: > >IIRC fonts are not copyrightable in the US, but are elsewhere, yes? > > > >Assuming that's correct, then an algorithmic font (eg Postscript) could be > >turned into an albeit large static set of pixels which wouldn't be > >copyrightable in the US.