Or if choate or ravage forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Less work.
On 19 Mar 2002 at 15:24, Morlock Elloi wrote: > > If you use lne.com for your node, which seems to kill spam quite nicely, > > and you're properly bozo-filtered, you don't, as they say in > > linguistically-challenged neighborhoods, see shit. It's cool. Even when > > Choate changes his virus coat like he did this afternoon, a few seconds > > with Eudora's make-filter command, and poof, he's lost to the breeze like > > so much dandruff. > > For asexual approach, block these: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > But, frankly, hortatorations to the Choatster himself, about his behavior, > > on the public list channel, is frankly, a complete waste of bandage. In a > > word, go find a room, and do your sado-masochism offline, where the rest of > > us don't have to watch it, please. > > Interestingly, this is the best illustration about selective focus and > inability to incorporate new facts into ancient responses. > > This list is a "territory" and as such it must be "defended". Filtering is > somehow "cheating" and non-manly. Although most silverbacks here know more than > well how to execute filtering, they bitch instead. Growl growl. > > For some inane reason (and it is NOT bandwidth or a techical issue), there is a > huge difference between choatian TCP packet being stopped at HIS node (ie. he > not sending) and being stopped at recipients node (shit not being seen). > > Ingress of said packet into recipient's machine, although invisible to the > recipient, is experienced as anal rape (or vaginal, for the 3 femmes here.) > > I would say that the moment the packet enters classic or DSL modem is felt as > rape. Therefore, print label "rectum" (or "vagina") and affix it near the the > RJ-11(RJ-45) on your modem. That may clear up the semantic confusion and > provide rational explanation for bitching. > > And now that *this* packet entered, ohhhh, it feels soooooo good. Multicast > sex, I invented it. I liked your RJ. So tight. > > Hope it was good for you, too. > > > (meta-meta-meta is, of course, acceptable) > > > > ===== > end > (of original message) > > Y-a*h*o-o (yes, they scan for this) spam follows: > Yahoo! Sports - live college hoops coverage > http://sports.yahoo.com/
