> I concur. In fact, I was surprised that not a single one of the many P2P > solutions presented at the recent excellent CODECON made any mention of > support for IPv6, which can be easily be added to just about any P2P > application, while every presenter bemoaned the fact that the existence > of NAT's between nodes provided severe design and functionality > constraints. The fix is not just obvious, it is downright trivial on any > modern OS.
How exactly does the introduction of IPV6 on a machine that is NAT-ted by the ISP who doesn't give shit about IPV6 help the situation ? Are you saying that putting *any* software/OS on a computer behind NAT/firewall somehow magically gives it visibility from the outside ? ===== end (of original message) Y-a*h*o-o (yes, they scan for this) spam follows: Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness http://health.yahoo.com
