Barney Wolff wrote: > My use of "anonym" was a joke. Sorry if it was too deadpan. But > my serious point was that if a pseudonym costs nothing to get or > give up, it makes one effectively anonymous, if one so chooses.
Well, yeah, I'd say that single-use pseudonyms are, in fact, the definition of anonyms. Zero cost is not required, of course, except to make anonymity, err, zero cost. Cheers, Ben. -- http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.thebunker.net/ "There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff
