--
On 15 Aug 2002 at 15:26, AARG! Anonymous wrote:
> Basically I agree with Adam's analysis. At this point I
> think he understands the spec equally as well as I do. He
> has a good point about the Privacy CA key being another
> security weakness that could break the whole system. It
> would be good to consider how exactly that problem could be
> eliminated using more sophisticated crypto.
Lucky claims to have pointed this out two years ago, proposed
more sophisticated crypto, and received a hostile reception.
Which leads me to suspect that the capability of the powerful
to break the system is a designed in feature.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
JjoH8U8qZ1eOdT/yGjfV7Xz9andBZPeYWaOLC+NP
2/OJG2MZSnAqcyuvUsNZTsQAcffGGST6LJ7e9vFbK
