On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 12:53:36PM -0700, Joseph Ashwood wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "James A. Donald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > The chief barrier to use of outlook's email encryption, aside > > from the fact that is broken, is the intolerable cost and > > inconvenience of certificate management. > Actually the chief barrier is psychological, people don't feel they should > side with the criminals by using encryption. Certificate management is
Um. No. Most people do no assocaite encryption with criminals. There are 4 reasons people don't use encryption in email: 0) "Encryption, that's that SLS thingy, right?" (Ignorance, stupidity) 1) Why bother? I am not a *target*. (apathy) 2) It's too much hassle. (BAD tools) 3) 95% of the people *I* send email to wouldn't know what to do with a message in S/MIME, much less PGP. (AKA the Fax Effect). -- Johnny had four truckloads of plutonium. Johnny used four | Quit smoking: truckloads of plutonium to light New York City for a year. | 161d, 11h ago Then how many truckloads of plutonium did Johnny have? Six! | petro@ -- Breeder reactor ad from the glory days of nuclear power | bounty.org