>  > David E. Weekly[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Which means that you should start thinking about
> > > using OTP *now* if you have secrets you'd like to keep past when an
> > > adversary of yours might have access to a quantum computer. ...
>
> OTPs won't help a bit for that problem.
> They're fine for transmitting new data if you've already sent a pad,
> but they're useless for storing secrets, because you can only decrypt
> something if you've got the pad around, and you have to burn the pad after
> use.

Yes, sorry -- I should have clarified as "you should start thinking about
encrypting data transmissions using OTP *now* if you'd like to send secrets
you'd like to keep..." -- destroying both pads after transmission should be
obvious. I wasn't attempting to address secure data storage.

-d

Reply via email to