Sigh, for the nth time already: While it's likely that bare boards, replacement and replaced parts, manuals, access codes to tell the satelite it's being worked on, etc... would burn up, pieces that were shielded would survive. Think!
----------------------Kaos-Keraunos-Kybernetos--------------------------- + ^ + :NSA got $20Bil/year |Passwords are like underwear. You don't /|\ \|/ :and didn't stop 9-11|share them, you don't hang them on your/\|/\ <--*-->:Instead of rewarding|monitor, or under your keyboard, you \/|\/ /|\ :their failures, we |don't email them, or put them on a web \|/ + v + :should get refunds! |site, and you must change them very often. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sunder.net ------------ On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, [ISO-8859-1] Mikko Sdreld wrote: > On Sun, 2 Feb 2003, Sunder wrote: > > Far more than likely, the truth is closer that the Space Shuttles have > > been performing ultra sensitive spy work - launching new spy satelites, or > > repairing them, and may have pieces of spy satelites on them. > > > > Let's see, we're going into war with Iraq, and we're sending up the > > shuttle to do experiments on how furry weavols behave under zero > > gravity... uh huh. > > Now why would they have spy satellites on board still when they are coming > _down_? One might think that if such things were part of the mission > they'd leave them up to spy, rather than bring them back down. > > -- > Mikko "One Ring to rule them all, > One Ring to find them, > One Ring to bring them all > And in the Darkness bind them."
