Britain accused on terror lab claim
Story of find in Afghan cave 'was made up' to justify sending marines
Peter Beaumont and Ed Vulliamy in New York Sunday March 24, 2002 The
Observer
Britain was accused last night of falsely claiming that al-Qaeda
terrorists had built a 'biological and chemical weapons' laboratory in
Afghanistan to justify the deployment of 1,700 Royal Marines to fight
there. The allegation follows a Downing Street briefing by a senior
official to newspapers on Friday which claimed US forces had discovered a
biological weapons laboratory in a cave in eastern Afghanistan after
fighting near the city of Gardez this month.
A 'senior Whitehall source' gave detailed claims of how American soldiers
had found the cave following heavy fighting for al-Qaeda positions around
the village of Shah-e-Kot.
One report quoted the source as saying: 'We know from documents found in
Kabul and the lab in the cave that Osama bin Laden has acquired a
chemical and biological weapons capability.'
The newspapers reported that the find was one of the main reasons the
Government had decided to send the Marines to Afghanistan to fight
al-Qaeda and Taliban forces. The claim, carried by a number of newspapers
yesterday, was denied emphatically last night by Pentagon and State
Department sources.
A White House spokesman, drawn into the row, said 'no evidence' had yet
been uncovered in Afghanistan that Al Qaeda had succeeded in producing
anthrax or other biological or chemical agents.
A Pentagon official told The Observer there was no intelligence to
support claims from London that al-Qaeda was developing biological
weapons in the Shah-e-Kot area. 'I don't know what they're saying in
London but we have received no specific intelligence on that kind of
development or capability in the Shah-e-Kot valley region - I mean a
chemical or biological weapons facility,' said an official in the Army
department in Washington.
The US rebuttal came as Opposition spokesmen demanded that Defence
Secretary Geoff Hoon address the House of Commons to 'clarify' the
claims, amid growing backbench unrest about the way in which the decision
to send the marines was made.
The first of them are due to arrive in Kabul in the next few days to join
US combat troops already fighting on the ground, amid concern among MPs
about the 'open ended' nature of their mission.
Liberal Democrat foreign affairs spokesman Menzies Campbell, who called
for Hoon to make a statement, said: 'The House will feel, with some
justification, that this claim was leaked to the media to justify the
deployment after the event.
'There are too many unanswered questions about the military justification
for this deployment and growing unease. Mr Hoon owes the House a
clarification."
The Tories demanded that Downing Street stick strictly to the truth in
its efforts to promote the military campaign. 'Spinning doesn't work for
the NHS, so why do they think it is going to work for the war on
terrorism?' said Bernard Jenkin, Shadow Defence Secretary.
Doubts about the story surfaced almost immediately after it was
published, as US officials first expressed bafflement and then denied any
such lab had been found. Some speculating to the New York Times that the
story might have been planted to justify the deployment of the marines.
British intelligence, Ministry of Defence and Foreign Office sources
denied any knowledge of the lab.
The only evidence of a biological weapons laboratory was the discovery
last December of an abandoned, half-finished building containing medical
equipment, near the Taliban's former power base of Kandahar in southern
Afghanistan. This had been reported previously.
The Observer has established that the source of the claims was an
off-the-record briefing by Tony Blair's senior foreign policy adviser,
David Manning.
A Downing Street spokesman said it 'stuck by the thrust of the story' -
that it had evidence al-Qaeda was 'interested' in acquiring such weapons.
But Manning had 'not actually told' reporters a cave lab had been
discovered.
Link:
http://www.observer.co.uk/politics/story/0,6903,673170,00.html