from the old-wine-in-new-bottles dept.

Cheers,
RAH
-------

At 11:24 AM +0000 9/17/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
>| Post-copyright: Digital Cash and Compulsory Licensing?             |
>|   from the dream-on dept.                                          |
>|   posted by michael on Tuesday September 16, @15:16 (money)        |
>|   http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/09/16/188259               |
>+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
>
>[0]gojomo writes "AaronSw offers a compelling idea: [1]use anonymous
>transferable digital cash to allocate the monies collected for creators
>in a compulsory licensing scheme, to avoid some of the potential problems
>[2]outlined [3]by [4]other [5]compulsory [6]critiques. LawMeme calls it a
>"[7]Proto Whuffie" but expects fake artists to sign up for the loot. I
>might call it "[8]voucher socialism" -- but that's not necessarily a bad
>thing."
>
>Discuss this story at:
>    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=03/09/16/188259
>
>Links:
>    0. http://gojomo.blogspot.com
>    1. http://www.aaronsw.com/weblog/001036
>    2. http://www.aaronsw.com/weblog/001016
>    3. http://epeus.blogspot.com/2003_06_01_epeus_archive.html#105643720859547400
>    4. http://www.utdallas.edu/~liebowit/intprop/complpff.pdf
>    5. http://research.yale.edu/lawmeme/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1190
>    6. http://www.sims.berkeley.edu/~fredrik/research/papers/EvaluatingDRM.html
>    7. 
> http://research.yale.edu/lawmeme/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1208&mode=&order=0&thold=0
>    8. http://gojomo.blogspot.com/#106373171922274440

-- 
-----------------
R. A. Hettinga <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation <http://www.ibuc.com/>
44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA
"... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity,
[predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to
experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'

Reply via email to