Well, I don't think the truly passive route is the most appropriate.

At least, I can imagine the DHCP of Starbucks, for instance, will be "aware" of my computer's Ethernet address, or at least it can be 'modified' to look for me and report (to a TLA) when I'm online. (I'm no datacom guy so I may have fumbled the correct usage of the terminology.)

With an active device "I" could be made to look different every time. (I suppose some of this could be done in my laptop, but let's just assume I don't own this computer and can't modify it.)

And I'd prefer if it didn't cost me an arm and a leg (come to think of it, I could probably just buy a few cheap Linksys WiFi routers and scatter them around, but I was hoping for something even cheaper, smaller, and less obtrusive.)

-TD





From: R/db <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Tyler Durden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: WiFi Repeater?
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 12:11:00 -0800

On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 02:20:15PM -0500, Tyler Durden wrote:
> DOES THERE EXIST something like a WiFi "repeater", which will allow me to
> "reach" that public WiFi spot without my being within 200 feet or so?


How about an antenna, instead?  It would work if you have
line-of-sight.

If you're really looking for a repeater, check the comments
from the community 802.11 groups, like Seattle Wireless:

http://www.seattlewireless.net/index.cgi/PassiveRepeater



_________________________________________________________________
Enjoy a special introductory offer for dial-up Internet access — limited time only! http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup




Reply via email to