On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 11:46:29PM +0000, Justin wrote: > > Why should it be impermissible for corporations to be "persons" under > the law when parents can be "persons" on behalf of their minor children?
Why should they be? > > In both situations, one or more people are "persons" only to represent > others. Does a parent have any more right to act on behalf of others > than a company does? > > -- No, why should they? -- Harmon Seaver CyberShamanix http://www.cybershamanix.com