----- Forwarded message from jrandom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ----- From: jrandom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 12:54:48 -0800 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [i2p] weekly status notes [jan 4]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi y'all, time for our first weekly status notes of 2005 * Index 1) Net status 2) 0.4.2.6 3) 0.5 4) jabber @ chat.i2p 5) ??? * 1) Net status Over the last week, things have been pretty interesting on the net - on nye, there were some comments posted to a popular website talking about i2p-bt and we've had a small burst of new users. At the moment there are between 120-150 routers on the net, though that peaked at 160 a few days ago. The network held its own though, with high capacity peers picking up the excess load without much disruption to other peers. Some users running without bandwidth limits on really fast links have reported throughput of 2-300KBps, while those with less capacity use the usual low 1-5KBps. I think I remember Connelly mentioning that he was seeing 300+ different routers over the course of a few days after new years, so there has been significant churn. On the other hand, we now have a steady 120-150 users online, unlike the previous 80-90, which is a reasonable increase. We still do *not* want it to grow too much yet though, as there are known implementation issues that still need to be done. Specifically, until the 0.6 release [1], we're going to want to stay below 2-300 peers to keep the number of threads at a reasonable level. However, if someone wants to help out implementing the UDP transport, we can get there much faster. In the last week, I've watched the stats put out by the i2p-bt trackers and there have been gigs of large files transferred, with some reports of 80-120KBps. IRC has had more bumps than usual since those comments were posted on that website, but its still on the order of hours between disconnect. (from what I can tell, the router that irc.duck.i2p is on has been running pretty close to its bandwidth limit, which would explain things) [1] http://www.i2p.net/roadmap#0.6 * 2) 0.4.2.6 There have been some fixes and new features added to CVS since the 0.4.2.5 release that we're going to want to roll out soon, including reliability fixes for the streaming lib, improved resiliance to IP address change, and the bundling of ragnarok's addressbook implementation. If you haven't heard of the addressbook or haven't used it, the short story is that it will magically update your hosts.txt file by periodically fetching and merging changes from some anonymously hosted locations (default being http://dev.i2p/i2p/hosts.txt and http://duck.i2p/hosts.txt). You won't need to change any files, touch any configuration, or run any extra applications - it'll be deployed inside the I2P router as a standard .war file. Of course, if you *do* want to get down and dirty with the addressbook, you are more than welcome to - see Ragnarok's site [2] for the details. People who already have the addressbook deployed in their router will need to do a little tap dancing during the 0.4.2.6 upgrade, but it'll work with all your old config settings. [2] http://ragnarok.i2p/ * 3) 0.5 Numbers, numbers, numbers! Well, as I've said before, the 0.5 release will be revamping how the tunnel routing works, and progress is being made on that front. For the last few days I've been implementing the new encryption code (and unit tests), and once they're working I'll post up a doc describing my current thoughts on how, what, and why the new tunnel routing will operate. I'm getting the encryption implemented for it now instead of later so that people can review what it means in a concrete sense, as well as find problems areas and suggestions for improvement. I'm hoping to have the code working by the end of the week, so maybe there'll be more docs posted this weekend. No promises though. * 4) jabber @ chat.i2p jdot has started up a new jabber server, and it seems to work pretty well for both one on one conversations and group chat. check out the info on the forum [3]. the i2p dev discussion channel will still be the irc #i2p, but its always nice to have alternatives. [3] http://forum.i2p.net/viewtopic.php?t=229 * 5) ??? Ok, thats about all I have to mention at the moment - I'm sure there's lots more going on that other people want to bring up though, so swing on by the meeting in 15m @ the usual place [4] and tell us whats up! =jr [4] irc://irc.{duck,baffled}.i2p/#i2p irc://iip/#i2p irc://irc.freenode.net/#i2p -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFB2wGXGnFL2th344YRAuAkAJwPh8frN6Caof0unduGzijXFyFDnwCfXD/8 ZQXQmqk6EIx184r2Zi7poZg= =+oCL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ i2p mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://i2p.dnsalias.net/mailman/listinfo/i2p ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07078, 11.61144 http://www.leitl.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE http://moleculardevices.org http://nanomachines.net
pgpKfpFZM4Xer.pgp
Description: PGP signature