This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SMTP error from remote mailer after RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
host continuity.labor.koeln.ccc.de [2001:6f8:12f3:1:200:f8ff:fe76:53f3]:
550 unknown user
------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from outlier.minder.net ([65.75.150.100])
by weltregierung.koeln.ccc.de with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1DffZk-0004Nu-B5
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 07 Jun 2005 17:01:14 +0200
Received: from waste.minder.net (waste.minder.net [66.92.53.73])
by outlier.minder.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j56Ehihl072815
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 10:44:00 -0400 (EDT)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from waste.minder.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by waste.minder.net (8.12.8p2/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j56EhhbY095612
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 10:43:44 -0400 (EDT)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by waste.minder.net (8.12.8p2/8.12.8/Submit) id j56EhgiR095593
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 10:43:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from outlier.minder.net (outlier [65.75.150.100])
by waste.minder.net (8.12.8p2/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j56Eh0bY095562
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for <cpunks@minder.net>; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 10:43:01 -0400 (EDT)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from proton.jfet.org ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [69.60.117.34] (may be
forged))
by outlier.minder.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j56Egpur072802
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL)
for <cpunks@minder.net>; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 10:42:54 -0400 (EDT)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from proton.jfet.org ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])
by proton.jfet.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-1) with ESMTP id j56Egpp6003850
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT)
for <cpunks@minder.net>; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 10:42:51 -0400
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by proton.jfet.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j56EgohJ003846
for cpunks@minder.net; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 10:42:50 -0400
Received: from mail16.bluewin.ch (mail16.bluewin.ch [195.186.19.63])
by proton.jfet.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-1) with ESMTP id j56EgZv0003842
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 10:42:50 -0400
Received: from station (62.202.17.50) by mail16.bluewin.ch (Bluewin 7.2.060.1)
id 429D749100070618 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 14:41:52
+0000
Old-Subject: Intel Adds DRM to New Chips part 2
From: DiSToAGe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 16:41:50 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4-3mdk
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6
(outlier.minder.net [65.75.150.100]); Mon, 06 Jun 2005 10:44:01 -0400 (EDT)
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.6
(waste.minder.net [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 06 Jun 2005 10:43:44 -0400 (EDT)
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.6
(waste.minder.net [66.92.53.73]); Mon, 06 Jun 2005 10:43:18 -0400 (EDT)
X-Greylist: IP, sender and recipient auto-whitelisted, not delayed by
milter-greylist-1.6 (outlier.minder.net [65.75.150.100]); Mon, 06 Jun 2005
10:42:55 -0400 (EDT)
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 65.75.150.100
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Intel Adds DRM to New Chips part 2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on
weltregierung.koeln.ccc.de
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO,
SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.0.3
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Thu, 03 Mar 2005 10:44:12 +0100)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on weltregierung.koeln.ccc.de)
it seems now intel say there is no DRM in there chips.
Earlier FUD ? marketing tactic ? desire to hide truth to public as
discussed before ?
http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/06/05/1833241
