On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 18:55:55 +0200, "Rudy Gevaert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Ken Murchison wrote: > > > So, is it your opinion that this doesn't need to be fixed, or shouldn't > > be fixed? > > > > Te be honest, I would like to see it fixed. > > Thanks in advance, > > Rudy
Bringing back some context: >> I'm busy looking at delayed delete. I'm using unix hierarchy seperator. I >> deleted a mailbox and see it like this: >> >> kavula.ugent.be> lm >> DELETED/user/rudy.gevaert/Foo/[EMAIL PROTECTED] (\HasNoChildren) >> user/rudy.gevaert/[EMAIL PROTECTED] (\HasNoChildren) >> user/rudy.gevaert/[EMAIL PROTECTED] (\HasNoChildren) >> user/rudy.gevaert/[EMAIL PROTECTED] (\HasNoChildren) >> user/[EMAIL PROTECTED] (\HasChildren) >> >> However the file system location is: >> /var/cyrus/imap/domain/u/ugent.be/u/DELETED/user/rudy^gevaert/Foo/471364C1/ >> >> I would have thought it would be under domain/u/ugent.be/DELETED/user/... Just to clarify exactly what you want, do you: a) think that the DELETED folders should not be hashed? (your example) b) think they should be hashed based on the username rather than into 'u'? c) think something entirely different should be done with them? My (c) is as I posted in my followup: > We wrote our userhash patch so the locations would be: > > /var/cyrus/imap/domain/u/ugent.be/user/rudy^gevaert/DELETED.user.rudy^gevaert.Foo.471364C1/ > /var/cyrus/imap/domain/u/ugent.be/user/rudy^gevaert/user.rudy^gevaert > /var/cyrus/imap/domain/u/ugent.be/user/rudy^gevaert/user.rudy^gevaert.Inbox2 > /var/cyrus/imap/domain/u/ugent.be/user/rudy^gevaert/user.rudy^gevaert.Trash So that all the folders related to the same user are in the same directory and have dots in their names as separators rather than being subdirectories of each other. This is obviously only one of many options, and has the downside that it's a completely new filesystem layout that requires a rehash run for every folder rather than just affecting a few deleted folders. Bron. -- Bron Gondwana [EMAIL PROTECTED]
