On Tue, 12 Oct 2010, Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems) wrote: > Should there be any bugs that obviously still apply to the current code, then > for the 2.1 series, these bugs have apparently been idle for about 5 years, > without proper follow-up from either side.
Yeah. Such as locking bugs. > That said though, is there an example you have in mind, or are we merely > speculating on the hypothetical? Well, I've seen in some other projects information get lost because of mass cleanups where there was not an effort to "unshelf" still important bugs. This is stuff that has been left idle for a long time because they were not pursued when reported, but would be pursued now if someone brought them back to the foreground. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh
