On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 05:39:32PM +0100, Julien Coloos wrote: > On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Bron Gondwana <br...@fastmail.fm> wrote: > > Yes, it sounds excellent. We use git for version control now - so you > > could easily fork a copy and put it somewhere (github for example) with > > your patch, and just point us to the branch :) Or put the diff in > > bugzilla - whatever suits. > > We are not using git yet, but it seems interesting enough to start > doing so from now on. We will be looking into it, so it shall take > some more time before we can get back to you with a patch.
No worries. This looks like something that would be good to get into 2.5 when we release it. I'm thinking the timeframe is 1-2 months, depending what else is ready :) > > One question: do you attempt to keep mailboxes for the same user > > together on the same partition/same server? While same partition > > isn't really necessary (just somewhat desirable) - same server > > is pretty useful. Otherwise things like seen files become a mess > > (less so in 2.4.x, but still) > > Indeed, keeping the user mailboxes on the same partition/server seems > more logical. > Only new user account is concerned by this behaviour. When a new user > subfolder is created, its parent server/partition is still retrieved > and used unless explicitely given as parameter upon creation. Fantastic - it looks like you've given it a lot of thought! This is exactly the sort of contribution we love to get. Thanks, Bron.
