Hi Dan, hi all! > I gather one of the sticking points is developer > access to Mac OS X.
Can anyone confirm that? I am not a Mac guy, but there are tons of offers for Mac root servers, i.e. hosted Mac Minis or similar at a quite affordable rate. In case access to a Mac is what would make developers go, my organisation may consider donating a hosted Mac for a couple of months. Just let me now. Regards, Torsten -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 08:57:39 -0500 > Von: Dan White <dwh...@olp.net> > An: Torsten Schlabach <tschlab...@gmx.net> > CC: cyrus-devel@lists.andrew.cmu.edu > Betreff: Re: SASL lib 2.1.24 > On 04/04/11 15:25 +0200, Torsten Schlabach wrote: > >Hi! > > > >In the meanwhile I managed to find some hacks to make the whole thing > build. > > > >But the question remains: > > > >Is anyone still interested in active development of the SASL lib? I mean, > >the 2.1.24rc1 is getting some 20 month old and there is neither an RC2 > nor > >a release. Also some problems have been discussed on the ML and some > >patches are hanging around in Bugzilla, which are not committed to CVS. > > > >So would there be anyone willing to support an RC2 and a release anytime > >soon? I would volunteer for some efforts on my end in terms of applying > >patches, doing tests and also with regards to Debian patching. But > without > >the support of the people who own the thing and have write access to CVS > >there will be no results possible. > > > >Any comments anyone? > > I'd also like to offer time to test current CVS and patches to get an RC2 > out the door. I gather one of the sticking points is developer access to > Mac OS X. I have access to a Mac system and can do some testing. > > Are there intentions to move away from CVS to git for sasl? Are there any > developer TODO lists for the project? > > -- > Dan White
