Hi! > Torsten, > > GS2 depends on MIT version MIT Kerberos 1.9, which is not in Debian > stable. > I was able to build the gs2 module last night on testing.
I am quite ok if it doesn't build; I don't need it. Just want to make sure it does not *break* the build of the rest. But seriously: One may want to give the Debian packagers a heads-up about that new module. I guess it would have to become a separate binary package like libsasl2-modules-gs2 which will then depend on libk5crypto3 libkrb5-3 libkrb5support0 (>= 1.9) Regards, Torsten -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 09:49:30 -0500 > Von: Dan White <dwh...@olp.net> > An: Torsten Schlabach <tschlab...@gmx.net> > CC: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melni...@isode.com>, > cyrus-devel@lists.andrew.cmu.edu > Betreff: Re: SASL lib 2.1.24 > On 14/04/11 16:15 +0200, Torsten Schlabach wrote: > >Hi! > > > >But again, problem solved. So we now have a version in CVS which builds > >without any additional patches including the LDAP module. My test build > >did not include the gs2 module, I think, possibly because some > >prerequisite is missing, but to me that is a detail of Debian packaging > >then. I am still trying to understand what I would ever need GSSAPI and > >GS2 for. I know what I need LDAP for. > > Torsten, > > GS2 depends on MIT version MIT Kerberos 1.9, which is not in Debian > stable. > I was able to build the gs2 module last night on testing. > > >3. Pre-sort the list of currently 26 patches in the Debian package for > >SASL lib 2.1.23 and identify those who are NOT Debian adjustments and > >provide them for review (what format?) > > Check out the Changelog around 2009-02-20. Alexey applied 4 Debian > patches. > > -- > Dan White
