On Thursday, 14. April 2011 17:45:11 Thomas Jarosch wrote: > Here's my proposal to make duplicate suppression more robust: > Combine the "message-id" header field with the "date" header field > for the duplicate check. If a broken client reuses the message-id, > there's a good chance the date field changed. > > Opinions?
Since noone objected, we're going to implement this around the end of July. The patch will be sent to the list. Best regards, Thomas Jarosch
