Alexey Melnikov wrote:
Bron Gondwana wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 12:37:52PM -0400, Ken Murchison wrote:
+1 for RSS (obviously)
I think if it's going into production it should go onto the
roadmap for 2.5 as well, unless we get 2.5 out before then.
Otherwise the development effort of keeping it separate is
too much work.
And +1 for RSS - we want it too.
Sounds like a good idea. But my question is: which version(s) of RSS?
RSS 2.0: http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification
Do you want to make an argument for something else, like ATOM?
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5023
--
Kenneth Murchison
Principal Systems Software Engineer
Carnegie Mellon University
