So Cyrus has three different types of domain split: * none at all * "on/yes" => weird reverse DNS hackery * userid => login with domain.
As part of finally switching to unixheirarchysep: on (yay) and better key format (double yay) I want to change the overarching "split users into separate domains" logic we have right now. Yes, that means a massive change, instead of internally: example.com!user.foo.bar <=> user/foo/b...@example.com (which is a million ways of bogus) we would have: user.foo@example^com.bar <=> user/f...@example.com/bar Or in alt namspace: Other Users/f...@example.com/bar This means we will finally be able to share things across domains. It creates a single consistent way to access everything. ============ The problem is, it means you can't set quotas per domain, you can't have sieve scripts per domain, and most of all - you can't have shared folders in a domain. example.com!shared.stuff worked fine, but shared.example^com.stuff would be weird. It's just a folder, and wouldn't be treated specially in any way. The domain would have no special meaning. This is all, obviously, Cyrus 3.0 stuff. It's a significant change in how folder naming works. It's really good for removing some inconsistencies though. I just want to have an idea of whether it will mess up anyone's existing workflows - and if so how we can make sure you can still achieve a similar result, even if it doesn't look quite the same in the new world. Bron. -- Bron Gondwana br...@fastmail.fm
