> Presumably there's no harm with running 'reconstruct -R' on "everything"?
Shouldn't be, since reconstruct is supposed to fix all problems, and I used it quite a bit after the upgrade. I actually did `reconstruct -rfGO' over everything, which took a while. The -O option is because reconstruct dumped a core file into the mail spool on occasion, so I'd have to restart it, and that would cause the core file to be removed.... I wonder if -G does everything -R does? Or which is preferable if they differ. g
