Dag, suposse the only 2.4 feature you really need is @decorators, then, Do you believe it would be too much hard to also implement a code conversion tool transforming the cython 2.4 sources to valid 2.3 code?
On 5/8/08, Dag Sverre Seljebotn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > This is a valid point. Also, as we work (via Dag's GSoC project for > > example) to make it easier to use numpy effectively from Cython, it > > does seem kind of odd to say "you need 2.3 to use NumPy, but 2.4 to > > use NumPy+Cython." > > I agree, this seems to pretty much override all my arguments. I'm not still convinced... as long as cython is used as a command line tool, you do not need cython depend on 2.3. Of couse, if you can develop a code conversion tool for decorators, then go on with 2.4!!! -- Lisandro Dalcín --------------- Centro Internacional de Métodos Computacionales en Ingeniería (CIMEC) Instituto de Desarrollo Tecnológico para la Industria Química (INTEC) Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) PTLC - Güemes 3450, (3000) Santa Fe, Argentina Tel/Fax: +54-(0)342-451.1594 _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
