Robert Bradshaw wrote:

> Yes, that is true. We are not trying to re-invent C++ here (which is  
> powerful but at the expense of a much steeper learning curve).

If you were going to reinvent some parameterised type
system, I'd suggest reinventing Eiffel instead -- it has
quite a nice one, without any of the bizarrities of C++
templates.

Another nice model to follow would be Haskell (although
I'd excuse you for skipping the typeclasses if you
weren't feeling up to it. :-)

-- 
Greg
_______________________________________________
Cython-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev

Reply via email to